Comparison of bone age assessment using manual Greulich and Pyle method versus automated BoneXpert method in South African children

Authors

  • Radhiya Minty Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
  • Nasreen Mahomed Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
  • Nicole van Wyk Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
  • Gopolang Mndebele Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
  • Zarina Lockhat Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria
  • Ashesh Ranchod Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v29i1.3033

Abstract

Background: The Greulich and Pyle (GP) method is the most commonly used manual bone age assessment method but it is associated with interrater variability. The BoneXpert method is fully automated, eliminates interrater variability and has been validated for use in various populations.

Objectives: To compare the manual GP method with the automated BoneXpert method in performing bone age assessment of children with various paediatric endocrinology diagnoses.

Method: Three manual readers performed manual bone age assessment, and BoneXpert software performed automated bone age assessment on 260 left hand-wrist radiographs. Images where the average of three manual readers (Manual BA) deviated from BoneXpert BA by > 1.5 years, were re-read by an external reader, producing a Reference BA. Manual BA was compared to Carpal BA that was produced by the software. A composite bone age (Comp BA) for the software was defined to estimate the weighting on carpal and tubular bones to achieve the best agreement with Manual BA.

Results: The interclass correlation (ICC) between each manual reader was > 0.9, indicating a high positive correlation. The ICC between Manual BA and BoneXpert BA was 0.982. The Comp BA for BoneXpert that would achieve the best fit with Manual BA, places a 50% weighting on Carpal BA and 50% weighting on Tubular BA.

Conclusion: The BoneXpert method is efficient, well-validated and shows a positive correlation with the manual GP method. An estimated weightage of 50% to carpal bones and 50% to tubular bones resulted in an automated Comp BA with the best agreement with Manual BA.

Contribution: This original research article compares manual and automated bone age assessment methods to evaluate the use of artificial intelligence tools in the South African context.

Author Biographies

Radhiya Minty, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

MBChB (Pret)

Nasreen Mahomed, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

MBBCh (Wits), FCRad Diag (SA), MMed (Wits), PhD (Wits)

Nicole van Wyk, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

MBBCh (Wits), DCH (SA), FCPaed (SA), Cert Endocrinology and Metabolism (Paed)

Gopolang Mndebele, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

MBChB (UKZN), FCRad Diag (SA), Mmed (Wits), Paediatric Neuroradiology (UofT)

Zarina Lockhat, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria

MBChB (UKZN), FCRad Diag (SA), PhD (Pret)

Ashesh Ranchod, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg

MBBCh (Wits), FCRad Diag (SA), EDiNR (Neuroradiology), EDiPNR (Paediatric Neuroradiology)

Published

2025-04-11

Issue

Section

Original Research